Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 8:04 amYes - more than expected.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 6:41 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:54 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:11 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 11:59 am

Nats have two. One of them is the coaches son, so technically, they only have one

Nats are irrelevant, and really so are the other 8 teams.
The only three in conversation would be the top three.
It’s impressive that TM has carried 10 orginal players with 6 from the novice year, which to me sounds like a well rounded team.

And ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!

True. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.

It is actually true , you need to get educated.

Award-winning athletes were more likely to be born late in the selection year than early in the year,” wrote Paul Ford and Mark Williams, the authors of the study. “The relatively younger athletes in our sample were able to stay in a developmental system that discriminated against them.” The authors suggested that “to survive in the system, relatively younger athletes must develop some other performance advantage, which is likely to be skill and its attributes, such as speed, technique and decision making. During their development, these younger athletes may benefit further in skill acquisition by playing the sport with relatively older athletes.”

And who is Tim Ford and Mark Williams?

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 9:05 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 6:41 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:54 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:11 pm


Nats are irrelevant, and really so are the other 8 teams.
The only three in conversation would be the top three.
It’s impressive that TM has carried 10 orginal players with 6 from the novice year, which to me sounds like a well rounded team.

And ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!

True. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.

It is actually true , you need to get educated.

Award-winning athletes were more likely to be born late in the selection year than early in the year,” wrote Paul Ford and Mark Williams, the authors of the study. “The relatively younger athletes in our sample were able to stay in a developmental system that discriminated against them.” The authors suggested that “to survive in the system, relatively younger athletes must develop some other performance advantage, which is likely to be skill and its attributes, such as speed, technique and decision making. During their development, these younger athletes may benefit further in skill acquisition by playing the sport with relatively older athletes.”

And who is Tim Ford and Mark Williams?

This is mht, not google siri jeopardy

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 9:05 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 6:41 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:54 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:11 pm


Nats are irrelevant, and really so are the other 8 teams.
The only three in conversation would be the top three.
It’s impressive that TM has carried 10 orginal players with 6 from the novice year, which to me sounds like a well rounded team.

And ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!

True. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.

It is actually true , you need to get educated.

Award-winning athletes were more likely to be born late in the selection year than early in the year,” wrote Paul Ford and Mark Williams, the authors of the study. “The relatively younger athletes in our sample were able to stay in a developmental system that discriminated against them.” The authors suggested that “to survive in the system, relatively younger athletes must develop some other performance advantage, which is likely to be skill and its attributes, such as speed, technique and decision making. During their development, these younger athletes may benefit further in skill acquisition by playing the sport with relatively older athletes.”

And who is Tim Ford and Mark Williams?

This is mht, not google siri jeopardy

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:11 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 11:59 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 6:40 am

Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 11:30 pm

VK has 1 left.
Jrc 2
Tm 10

Nats have a some

Nats have two. One of them is the coaches son, so technically, they only have one

Nats are irrelevant, and really so are the other 8 teams.
The only three in conversation would be the top three.
It’s impressive that TM has carried 10 orginal players with 6 from the novice year, which to me sounds like a well rounded team.

And ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!

True. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 12:08 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 9:05 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2024 6:41 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:54 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pm
And ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!

True. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.

It is actually true , you need to get educated.

Award-winning athletes were more likely to be born late in the selection year than early in the year,” wrote Paul Ford and Mark Williams, the authors of the study. “The relatively younger athletes in our sample were able to stay in a developmental system that discriminated against them.” The authors suggested that “to survive in the system, relatively younger athletes must develop some other performance advantage, which is likely to be skill and its attributes, such as speed, technique and decision making. During their development, these younger athletes may benefit further in skill acquisition by playing the sport with relatively older athletes.”

And who is Tim Ford and Mark Williams?

This is mht, not google siri jeopardy

lol but the person has a valid point. Who are these people running studies. And how legit is this.