Hamilton Steel

Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:09 pm He will score 100 goals in his own age
LA just scored 1 goal in 4 games in his own age group.
Easter scored 3.
Stop pretending LA is better than he is, that’s what got him in trouble in the first place.
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:27 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:51 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:04 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 6:18 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 6:04 pm The 2013 team will be stacked with No Names.
:? ... did I miss something?
Alamo just got his butt handed to him with 1 point in 4 games. He should be happy to be along for the ride. Role player.

His own age group will be a much better fit for the kid and is probably overdue. Good decision by the Steel and good luck to the kid and his family next year.

According to the Pres, it was the kids decision not the org . That 2013 steel team is going to be unreal with those additions
It was a team decision backed by the Pres. The kid wanted to stay up but was told it was for everyone’s benefit he move down. He will be glad he did though it’s a good move. He can help contribute in his own age. Was a total non factor playing a year up.
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:37 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:27 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:51 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:04 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 6:18 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 6:04 pm The 2013 team will be stacked with No Names.
:? ... did I miss something?
Alamo just got his butt handed to him with 1 point in 4 games. He should be happy to be along for the ride. Role player.

His own age group will be a much better fit for the kid and is probably overdue. Good decision by the Steel and good luck to the kid and his family next year.

According to the Pres, it was the kids decision not the org . That 2013 steel team is going to be unreal with those additions
It was a team decision backed by the Pres. The kid wanted to stay up but was told it was for everyone’s benefit he move down. He will be glad he did though it’s a good move. He can help contribute in his own age. Was a total non factor playing a year up.
Non factor , the kid was a beast and top 5 in the OMHA as a underager . lol
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:43 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:37 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:27 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:51 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:04 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 6:18 pm

:? ... did I miss something?
Alamo just got his butt handed to him with 1 point in 4 games. He should be happy to be along for the ride. Role player.

His own age group will be a much better fit for the kid and is probably overdue. Good decision by the Steel and good luck to the kid and his family next year.

According to the Pres, it was the kids decision not the org . That 2013 steel team is going to be unreal with those additions
It was a team decision backed by the Pres. The kid wanted to stay up but was told it was for everyone’s benefit he move down. He will be glad he did though it’s a good move. He can help contribute in his own age. Was a total non factor playing a year up.
Non factor , the kid was a beast and top 5 in the OMHA as a underager . lol
Top 5 in what? He wasn’t even top 30 in scoring last year check the stats. If he was top 5 they wouldn’t have cut him.
He’s 4’4” 65 lbs and has a shot like a 6 year old.
You aren’t fooling anybody Sam. LA was exposed at the brick, didn’t score a goal in Nashville and scored one in 4 games last weekend and it was a shot the bounced off him.
Stop being a baby and let your kid try and prove himself.
Stop talking BS because you aren’t fooling anybody.
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:52 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:43 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:37 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:27 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:51 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:04 pm

Alamo just got his butt handed to him with 1 point in 4 games. He should be happy to be along for the ride. Role player.

His own age group will be a much better fit for the kid and is probably overdue. Good decision by the Steel and good luck to the kid and his family next year.

According to the Pres, it was the kids decision not the org . That 2013 steel team is going to be unreal with those additions
It was a team decision backed by the Pres. The kid wanted to stay up but was told it was for everyone’s benefit he move down. He will be glad he did though it’s a good move. He can help contribute in his own age. Was a total non factor playing a year up.
Non factor , the kid was a beast and top 5 in the OMHA as a underager . lol
Top 5 in what? He wasn’t even top 30 in scoring last year check the stats. If he was top 5 they wouldn’t have cut him.
He’s 4’4” 65 lbs and has a shot like a 6 year old.
You aren’t fooling anybody Sam. LA was exposed at the brick, didn’t score a goal in Nashville and scored one in 4 games last weekend and it was a shot the bounced off him.
Stop being a baby and let your kid try and prove himself.
Stop talking BS because you aren’t fooling anybody.
So who fills his spot on the U13? All decent players are probably signed?
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 9:14 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:52 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:43 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:37 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:27 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 7:51 pm


His own age group will be a much better fit for the kid and is probably overdue. Good decision by the Steel and good luck to the kid and his family next year.

According to the Pres, it was the kids decision not the org . That 2013 steel team is going to be unreal with those additions
It was a team decision backed by the Pres. The kid wanted to stay up but was told it was for everyone’s benefit he move down. He will be glad he did though it’s a good move. He can help contribute in his own age. Was a total non factor playing a year up.
Non factor , the kid was a beast and top 5 in the OMHA as a underager . lol
Top 5 in what? He wasn’t even top 30 in scoring last year check the stats. If he was top 5 they wouldn’t have cut him.
He’s 4’4” 65 lbs and has a shot like a 6 year old.
You aren’t fooling anybody Sam. LA was exposed at the brick, didn’t score a goal in Nashville and scored one in 4 games last weekend and it was a shot the bounced off him.
Stop being a baby and let your kid try and prove himself.
Stop talking BS because you aren’t fooling anybody.
So who fills his spot on the U13? All decent players are probably signed?
MS wanted JG to stay
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 9:29 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 9:14 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:52 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:43 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:37 pm
Guest wrote: Wed May 01, 2024 8:27 pm


According to the Pres, it was the kids decision not the org . That 2013 steel team is going to be unreal with those additions
It was a team decision backed by the Pres. The kid wanted to stay up but was told it was for everyone’s benefit he move down. He will be glad he did though it’s a good move. He can help contribute in his own age. Was a total non factor playing a year up.
Non factor , the kid was a beast and top 5 in the OMHA as a underager . lol
Top 5 in what? He wasn’t even top 30 in scoring last year check the stats. If he was top 5 they wouldn’t have cut him.
He’s 4’4” 65 lbs and has a shot like a 6 year old.
You aren’t fooling anybody Sam. LA was exposed at the brick, didn’t score a goal in Nashville and scored one in 4 games last weekend and it was a shot the bounced off him.
Stop being a baby and let your kid try and prove himself.
Stop talking BS because you aren’t fooling anybody.
So who fills his spot on the U13? All decent players are probably signed?
MS wanted JG to stay
I don't think JG was the problem... I think it was the old man... I could be wrong.
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

No Names going to put on a show at his own age. Everyone so jealous Tommy sucks compared to No Names
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

No Names bring goalscoring to a team who heavily relies on rushing d to score all of the goals the rest of their forwards are all weak
Guest

Re: Hamilton Steel

Post by Guest »

I agree what No Names scores in one game was more output than three or four players scored all year
Post Reply