2010 GTHL A East
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
TR 7 - 8 AVS
Avs > TR
SIR 4 - 4 TR
SIR 3- 2 TR
SIR = Avs
Eagles > Avs = Eagles > SIR
Avs > TR
SIR 4 - 4 TR
SIR 3- 2 TR
SIR = Avs
Eagles > Avs = Eagles > SIR
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Huh?Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2025 10:22 am TR 7 - 8 AVS
Avs > TR
SIR 4 - 4 TR
SIR 3- 2 TR
SIR = Avs
Eagles > Avs = Eagles > SIR
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Sir4 avs0
Sir 2 Avs2
Sir>avs
So nope the math is off.
But if you add 3 and divide it by pi,subtract a blue crayon then and only then will this make sense.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Lowly MI > TRGuest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:32 pmSir4 avs0
Sir 2 Avs2
Sir>avs
So nope the math is off.
But if you add 3 and divide it by pi,subtract a blue crayon then and only then will this make sense.
MI beat the once ranked best team in Ontario. LOL
Will TR miss out on the playoffs (tongue firmly in cheek) and win the crayon.
Top 4 look set (SIR/FH/NT/VRE), with TA looking to be 5th (record worsening).
TR/LF fight for 6th and 7th, WH - 8th.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 9:00 amLowly MI > TRGuest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:32 pmSir4 avs0
Sir 2 Avs2
Sir>avs
So nope the math is off.
But if you add 3 and divide it by pi,subtract a blue crayon then and only then will this make sense.
MI beat the once ranked best team in Ontario. LOL
Will TR miss out on the playoffs (tongue firmly in cheek) and win the crayon.
Top 4 look set (SIR/FH/NT/VRE), with TA looking to be 5th (record worsening).
TR/LF fight for 6th and 7th, WH - 8th.
TA is as good as any of the top 4 listed above...it is a 5 man race based on consistency, LF and TR have shown they are capable but perhaps not as consistent...its getting good
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Look at win%. TA is in a tier just below the top 4 and above everyone else. They only have two wins against the other top teams.Guest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 9:08 amGuest wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 9:00 amLowly MI > TRGuest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 08, 2025 6:32 pmSir4 avs0
Sir 2 Avs2
Sir>avs
So nope the math is off.
But if you add 3 and divide it by pi,subtract a blue crayon then and only then will this make sense.
MI beat the once ranked best team in Ontario. LOL
Will TR miss out on the playoffs (tongue firmly in cheek) and win the crayon.
Top 4 look set (SIR/FH/NT/VRE), with TA looking to be 5th (record worsening).
TR/LF fight for 6th and 7th, WH - 8th.
TA is as good as any of the top 4 listed above...it is a 5 man race based on consistency, LF and TR have shown they are capable but perhaps not as consistent...its getting good
TA is close. But saying it's a 5 man race isn't being honest.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Anyone in the top 7 can win any series.
1st place gets a nice 1st round matchup but the rest are a coin flip. TA might not have the record that the top 4 do, but they certainly belong with them.
1st place gets a nice 1st round matchup but the rest are a coin flip. TA might not have the record that the top 4 do, but they certainly belong with them.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
I’m confused. Are you saying there are 4 contenders, 5 contenders, or 7 contenders? Make up your mind.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2025 10:27 am Anyone in the top 7 can win any series.
1st place gets a nice 1st round matchup but the rest are a coin flip. TA might not have the record that the top 4 do, but they certainly belong with them.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
TA is def a top team, don’t even look at the standings for the top 5…and of those teams can go on a run and win the league. There will be no easy series aside from 1v8.
TA just beat FH, so I rest my case.
Signed - top 4 team coach.
TA just beat FH, so I rest my case.
Signed - top 4 team coach.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
The east champ will be one of NT/SIR/VRE/FH. Sure, Aeros beat FH. Leaside have wins against SIR, FH and VRE. Is Leaside a contender too?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:05 pm TA is def a top team, don’t even look at the standings for the top 5…and of those teams can go on a run and win the league. There will be no easy series aside from 1v8.
TA just beat FH, so I rest my case.
Signed - top 4 team coach.
Overall record is what matters. Not one or two wins here or there.
Look at overall Win %. Aeros are closer to Ted Reeve than the top 4.
NT .800
SIR .800
VRE .761
FH .750
TA .673
TR .620
There's a HUGE difference between winning 75-80% of your games, and 67%. If you don't think that tells you who's got a stronger team, why the hell do we play all these regular season games?
Or look at it another way. The top 4 teams have 4 losses. Aeros have 6. TR and Leaside have 8.
I rest MY case.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 7469 Views
-
Last post by RZA
-
- 0 Replies
- 4284 Views
-
Last post by ShoulderCheck