2011 AAA

Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:50 am Vk no spots unless your 6’2
- 6’0 is good for now
> bigger the better only plays 3 kids
- top kids trending down. CS sees this and that’s why he’s working hard to get better
JrC issues listed above CIA
- will be top team
> loading up
- secretly building with top kids
Marlies parent coach, country club, letters run team
- who runs things? Parent coach or letters?
> it’s starting to crack, need to move past all the yoga
- top kids making calls. Something is going on
TT over committed
- carny got himself a problem. 32 kids coming in
> will be top 3
- top5
TYN parent coach and kaboom
- same thing every year
> boring hockey plays his son and daughter
- nothing will change
Reps rebuild
- embarrassing for those kids
> will work out
- this will be interesting. Probably 9/10
Nyr sells spots and promises and properly the worst parent group ever “ yo caro Taco Bell
- mht just got better in the 2011 thread
> this is legendary the new logo should be a straight jacket and Herb Arena remained to the Asylum
- this team will be the talk of the loop
Rebels coach has no proven success
- AA kids
> who is George ?
- greasy arrogant salesman
Sens good coach, west side
- A kids
> fun for the kids
Dmf good coach, year two
- Vic village too far to comment
> so is Iceland, caa, cia, paramount
- best coaching
Trw experienced coach
- bring your cash
> good coach comes with a price
- disaster of an org
MM parent coach with crazy parents
- sleeper in the loop
> worst style than the Nats, parent coach dump and chase, play son and friends
- most improved team and will get better
From all these teams, which ones have had players stay since day 1?
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:23 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:29 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:03 am Imagine if parents weren't involved? How much more fun would the kids have? How much quicker would they develop without all the pressure from the parents. Obviously, you'd need good coaching, but taking away that pressure would be a world of difference for hockey in Canada.
Love this, yes take away parents over involvement......and you would also equally need to remove every single coach in the loop/gthl and restructure the entire development model in a hierarchy (military delivery) where the coaches are trained and have oversight to implement the LTAD properly......or they are removed!

Current system is extremely outdated (1960's) volunteer model....and they volunteers coaches simply don't know what they don't know! This includes coaches that have played professionally as there is so much more to know to properly develop kids in elite sports (like 200% more then just knowing hockey)

At this point you have a GREAT development program!
Get rid of the leagues and create 1 super league 16 teams max east, west north and south. Open borders building programs and forcing parents to play their kids at their level. Better development and less crazies.
Even better, create two national training centres. One in Vancouver and on in Toronto. Have it fully funded and provide two high performance (HP)teams in each age group from U -13 to U -18.
- players selected receive a full periodized program supported by the top hockey resources in Canada ( coaches and sport science)
- selection process is intensive, science backed and bio-banded. So you are selecting the highest calibre athletes in Canada .
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 2:49 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:50 am Vk no spots unless your 6’2
- 6’0 is good for now
> bigger the better only plays 3 kids
- top kids trending down. CS sees this and that’s why he’s working hard to get better
JrC issues listed above CIA
- will be top team
> loading up
- secretly building with top kids
Marlies parent coach, country club, letters run team
- who runs things? Parent coach or letters?
> it’s starting to crack, need to move past all the yoga
- top kids making calls. Something is going on
TT over committed
- carny got himself a problem. 32 kids coming in
> will be top 3
- top5
TYN parent coach and kaboom
- same thing every year
> boring hockey plays his son and daughter
- nothing will change
Reps rebuild
- embarrassing for those kids
> will work out
- this will be interesting. Probably 9/10
Nyr sells spots and promises and properly the worst parent group ever “ yo caro Taco Bell
- mht just got better in the 2011 thread
> this is legendary the new logo should be a straight jacket and Herb Arena remained to the Asylum
- this team will be the talk of the loop
Rebels coach has no proven success
- AA kids
> who is George ?
- greasy arrogant salesman
Sens good coach, west side
- A kids
> fun for the kids
Dmf good coach, year two
- Vic village too far to comment
> so is Iceland, caa, cia, paramount
- best coaching
Trw experienced coach
- bring your cash
> good coach comes with a price
- disaster of an org
MM parent coach with crazy parents
- sleeper in the loop
> worst style than the Nats, parent coach dump and chase, play son and friends
- most improved team and will get better
From all these teams, which ones have had players stay since day 1?
Who cares? What value does that have in the long game?
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 2:49 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:50 am Vk no spots unless your 6’2
- 6’0 is good for now
> bigger the better only plays 3 kids
- top kids trending down. CS sees this and that’s why he’s working hard to get better
JrC issues listed above CIA
- will be top team
> loading up
- secretly building with top kids
Marlies parent coach, country club, letters run team
- who runs things? Parent coach or letters?
> it’s starting to crack, need to move past all the yoga
- top kids making calls. Something is going on
TT over committed
- carny got himself a problem. 32 kids coming in
> will be top 3
- top5
TYN parent coach and kaboom
- same thing every year
> boring hockey plays his son and daughter
- nothing will change
Reps rebuild
- embarrassing for those kids
> will work out
- this will be interesting. Probably 9/10
Nyr sells spots and promises and properly the worst parent group ever “ yo caro Taco Bell
- mht just got better in the 2011 thread
> this is legendary the new logo should be a straight jacket and Herb Arena remained to the Asylum
- this team will be the talk of the loop
Rebels coach has no proven success
- AA kids
> who is George ?
- greasy arrogant salesman
Sens good coach, west side
- A kids
> fun for the kids
Dmf good coach, year two
- Vic village too far to comment
> so is Iceland, caa, cia, paramount
- best coaching
Trw experienced coach
- bring your cash
> good coach comes with a price
- disaster of an org
MM parent coach with crazy parents
- sleeper in the loop
> worst style than the Nats, parent coach dump and chase, play son and friends
- most improved team and will get better
From all these teams, which ones have had players stay since day 1?
The one the coach can’t make tough decisions with his buddies. The teams regression is obvious
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:12 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:23 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:29 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:03 am Imagine if parents weren't involved? How much more fun would the kids have? How much quicker would they develop without all the pressure from the parents. Obviously, you'd need good coaching, but taking away that pressure would be a world of difference for hockey in Canada.
Love this, yes take away parents over involvement......and you would also equally need to remove every single coach in the loop/gthl and restructure the entire development model in a hierarchy (military delivery) where the coaches are trained and have oversight to implement the LTAD properly......or they are removed!

Current system is extremely outdated (1960's) volunteer model....and they volunteers coaches simply don't know what they don't know! This includes coaches that have played professionally as there is so much more to know to properly develop kids in elite sports (like 200% more then just knowing hockey)

At this point you have a GREAT development program!
Get rid of the leagues and create 1 super league 16 teams max east, west north and south. Open borders building programs and forcing parents to play their kids at their level. Better development and less crazies.
Even better, create two national training centres. One in Vancouver and on in Toronto. Have it fully funded and provide two high performance (HP)teams in each age group from U -13 to U -18.
- players selected receive a full periodized program supported by the top hockey resources in Canada ( coaches and sport science)
- selection process is intensive, science backed and bio-banded. So you are selecting the highest calibre athletes in Canada .
Sounds like you should move to Russia.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:31 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:12 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:23 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:29 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:03 am Imagine if parents weren't involved? How much more fun would the kids have? How much quicker would they develop without all the pressure from the parents. Obviously, you'd need good coaching, but taking away that pressure would be a world of difference for hockey in Canada.
Love this, yes take away parents over involvement......and you would also equally need to remove every single coach in the loop/gthl and restructure the entire development model in a hierarchy (military delivery) where the coaches are trained and have oversight to implement the LTAD properly......or they are removed!

Current system is extremely outdated (1960's) volunteer model....and they volunteers coaches simply don't know what they don't know! This includes coaches that have played professionally as there is so much more to know to properly develop kids in elite sports (like 200% more then just knowing hockey)

At this point you have a GREAT development program!
Get rid of the leagues and create 1 super league 16 teams max east, west north and south. Open borders building programs and forcing parents to play their kids at their level. Better development and less crazies.
Even better, create two national training centres. One in Vancouver and on in Toronto. Have it fully funded and provide two high performance (HP)teams in each age group from U -13 to U -18.
- players selected receive a full periodized program supported by the top hockey resources in Canada ( coaches and sport science)
- selection process is intensive, science backed and bio-banded. So you are selecting the highest calibre athletes in Canada .
Sounds like you should move to Russia.
Or Australia, England , Spain , Italy, USA etc

all have high performance training centres. Sounds like you live in an igloo when it comes to sports!
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:35 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:31 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:12 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:23 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:29 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:03 am Imagine if parents weren't involved? How much more fun would the kids have? How much quicker would they develop without all the pressure from the parents. Obviously, you'd need good coaching, but taking away that pressure would be a world of difference for hockey in Canada.
Love this, yes take away parents over involvement......and you would also equally need to remove every single coach in the loop/gthl and restructure the entire development model in a hierarchy (military delivery) where the coaches are trained and have oversight to implement the LTAD properly......or they are removed!

Current system is extremely outdated (1960's) volunteer model....and they volunteers coaches simply don't know what they don't know! This includes coaches that have played professionally as there is so much more to know to properly develop kids in elite sports (like 200% more then just knowing hockey)

At this point you have a GREAT development program!
Get rid of the leagues and create 1 super league 16 teams max east, west north and south. Open borders building programs and forcing parents to play their kids at their level. Better development and less crazies.
Even better, create two national training centres. One in Vancouver and on in Toronto. Have it fully funded and provide two high performance (HP)teams in each age group from U -13 to U -18.
- players selected receive a full periodized program supported by the top hockey resources in Canada ( coaches and sport science)
- selection process is intensive, science backed and bio-banded. So you are selecting the highest calibre athletes in Canada .
Sounds like you should move to Russia.
Or Australia, England , Spain , Italy, USA etc

all have high performance training centres. Sounds like you live in an igloo when it comes to sports!
Best programs in the US are private not fully funded.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:42 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:35 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:31 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 3:12 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:23 pm
Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:29 pm

Love this, yes take away parents over involvement......and you would also equally need to remove every single coach in the loop/gthl and restructure the entire development model in a hierarchy (military delivery) where the coaches are trained and have oversight to implement the LTAD properly......or they are removed!

Current system is extremely outdated (1960's) volunteer model....and they volunteers coaches simply don't know what they don't know! This includes coaches that have played professionally as there is so much more to know to properly develop kids in elite sports (like 200% more then just knowing hockey)

At this point you have a GREAT development program!
Get rid of the leagues and create 1 super league 16 teams max east, west north and south. Open borders building programs and forcing parents to play their kids at their level. Better development and less crazies.
Even better, create two national training centres. One in Vancouver and on in Toronto. Have it fully funded and provide two high performance (HP)teams in each age group from U -13 to U -18.
- players selected receive a full periodized program supported by the top hockey resources in Canada ( coaches and sport science)
- selection process is intensive, science backed and bio-banded. So you are selecting the highest calibre athletes in Canada .
Sounds like you should move to Russia.
Or Australia, England , Spain , Italy, USA etc

all have high performance training centres. Sounds like you live in an igloo when it comes to sports!
Best programs in the US are private not fully funded.
USNTDP is where it happens bud!
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

No one buying DDM bs this year, seems like parents finally figuring out it’s time to leave. Majority of new players that came this year are out along with a few others. Will be hard to replace, maybe with some more AA kids to make his kid look better.
Guest

Re: 2011 AAA

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:53 am Good luck at NYR. That collection of parents and coach influence will be a new low.
Ak and GM slamming new coach cause they are just garbage
GM go home spend time with the fam. You’re just as irrelevant as you were in April
Only ones following you are your little fat Caledon buddies
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post