A new place to talk about minor hockey in North America & Around the World. Jump in to the Minor Hockey Talk forum and discuss everything about Hockey in Canada & Hockey in the USA
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:09 pm
What coach in this loop would not cut you in a second. Loyalty is non existent in hockey parents. Just find the best team your kid can play on and realize it is a 12 month commitment. Find a team that wins, we played on a horrible team last year and losing is demoralizing. You can argue development, no chance. Go to a team that wins more than they lose. kid will want to improve if the kids around him are good.
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:09 pm
What coach in this loop would not cut you in a second. Loyalty is non existent in hockey parents. Just find the best team your kid can play on and realize it is a 12 month commitment. Find a team that wins, we played on a horrible team last year and losing is demoralizing. You can argue development, no chance. Go to a team that wins more than they lose. kid will want to improve if the kids around him are good.
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:09 pm
What coach in this loop would not cut you in a second. Loyalty is non existent in hockey parents. Just find the best team your kid can play on and realize it is a 12 month commitment. Find a team that wins, we played on a horrible team last year and losing is demoralizing. You can argue development, no chance. Go to a team that wins more than they lose. kid will want to improve if the kids around him are good.
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
You can call what ever you want. Then there’s the truth. Why wouldn’t a top kid want to go there? There’s tons of room for improvement and opportunity to excel. Unfortunately some parents don’t want your kid to surpass theirs. Top 3 and competitive no need to rock the boat. Look at what’s coming in? Good players willing to play behind the kids mentioned.
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:09 pm
What coach in this loop would not cut you in a second. Loyalty is non existent in hockey parents. Just find the best team your kid can play on and realize it is a 12 month commitment. Find a team that wins, we played on a horrible team last year and losing is demoralizing. You can argue development, no chance. Go to a team that wins more than they lose. kid will want to improve if the kids around him are good.
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
You can call what ever you want. Then there’s the truth. Why wouldn’t a top kid want to go there? There’s tons of room for improvement and opportunity to excel. Unfortunately some parents don’t want your kid to surpass theirs. Top 3 and competitive no need to rock the boat. Look at what’s coming in? Good players willing to play behind the kids mentioned.
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:09 pm
What coach in this loop would not cut you in a second. Loyalty is non existent in hockey parents. Just find the best team your kid can play on and realize it is a 12 month commitment. Find a team that wins, we played on a horrible team last year and losing is demoralizing. You can argue development, no chance. Go to a team that wins more than they lose. kid will want to improve if the kids around him are good.
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:09 pm
What coach in this loop would not cut you in a second. Loyalty is non existent in hockey parents. Just find the best team your kid can play on and realize it is a 12 month commitment. Find a team that wins, we played on a horrible team last year and losing is demoralizing. You can argue development, no chance. Go to a team that wins more than they lose. kid will want to improve if the kids around him are good.
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.