Alliance 2012 Hockey
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2023 10:14 am
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
A harmful statement will not amount to libel, if one of the following defences applies:
Made only to the person it is about. If it was only made to the person mentioned in the statement, and not to anyone else;
True statements. If it is actually true, and the person making the statement makes the statement honestly and not maliciously;
Absolute privilege applies to statements made in court (as evidence in a trial) or in parliament;
Qualified privilege protects statements made non-maliciously and for well-meaning reasons. For example, if an employer is requested to give a reference for an employee, and they give a statement that is their honest opinion;
Fair comment. The defence of fair comment may apply in situations where statements made were about issues of public interest, as long the comments were honest statements of opinion, based on fact. If your statements were malicious, this defence will not apply; and
Responsible communication of matters of public interest. This defence is available in libel cases. It allows journalists the ability to report statements and allegations, in cases where there is a public interest in distributing the information to a wide audience. However, this defence only applies where the news was urgent, serious and of public importance, and the journalist used reliable sources and tried to report both sides of the issue.
Made only to the person it is about. If it was only made to the person mentioned in the statement, and not to anyone else;
True statements. If it is actually true, and the person making the statement makes the statement honestly and not maliciously;
Absolute privilege applies to statements made in court (as evidence in a trial) or in parliament;
Qualified privilege protects statements made non-maliciously and for well-meaning reasons. For example, if an employer is requested to give a reference for an employee, and they give a statement that is their honest opinion;
Fair comment. The defence of fair comment may apply in situations where statements made were about issues of public interest, as long the comments were honest statements of opinion, based on fact. If your statements were malicious, this defence will not apply; and
Responsible communication of matters of public interest. This defence is available in libel cases. It allows journalists the ability to report statements and allegations, in cases where there is a public interest in distributing the information to a wide audience. However, this defence only applies where the news was urgent, serious and of public importance, and the journalist used reliable sources and tried to report both sides of the issue.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 8:35 am
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Okay enough of this crap about coaches…
Let’s make this interesting, all you guys seem to know a lot about the league and teams.
Let’s put together a list of the top talent in the Alliance, start with the top 2 players from each team and top 2 goalies in the league.
Then discuss whittling it down and see if we can all agree on the best talent in the alliance.
Let’s make this interesting, all you guys seem to know a lot about the league and teams.
Let’s put together a list of the top talent in the Alliance, start with the top 2 players from each team and top 2 goalies in the league.
Then discuss whittling it down and see if we can all agree on the best talent in the alliance.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2023 10:14 am
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Well Duster1234 kid has to be the top of the list right...
Funny when you have to log in people get shy
Funny when you have to log in people get shy
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 8:35 am
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Sure he can go first I don’t care!JackMeHoff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 2:07 pm Well Duster1234 kid has to be the top of the list right...
Funny when you have to log in people get shy
Im just curious seems everyone’s thoughts, everyone just seems to be crapping on coaches! It’s good reading hearing about all the issues but let’s change things up.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 8:35 am
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Brantford: Verbruggen/Dumesnil
Waterloo: Gowing/Reed
London: #13/10
Elgin: Lambourn/96
Lambton: Manders/Mainland
Chatham: Kenny/Campbell (Garant)
Kitchener: ?
Cambridge: ?
SC: Branovacki/Blain
Win: Candido/Marier
HP: McDonald/Taylor
Waterloo: Gowing/Reed
London: #13/10
Elgin: Lambourn/96
Lambton: Manders/Mainland
Chatham: Kenny/Campbell (Garant)
Kitchener: ?
Cambridge: ?
SC: Branovacki/Blain
Win: Candido/Marier
HP: McDonald/Taylor
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 8:35 am
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Goalies
Both London goalies or Chatham goalie
Both London goalies or Chatham goalie
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2023 10:14 am
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Brantford: Verbruggen/Dumesnil
Waterloo: Gowing/Reed
London: #13/10
Elgin: 78/96
Lambton: Manders/Mainland
Chatham: Kenny/Campbell (Garant)
Dont see the other side enough
Waterloo: Gowing/Reed
London: #13/10
Elgin: 78/96
Lambton: Manders/Mainland
Chatham: Kenny/Campbell (Garant)
Dont see the other side enough
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Rest assured, the kids got a stern talking to and going forward, this won’t be tolerated.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 2:05 pm need to stop? the inappropriate comments need to stop. You should not be ok with racist remarks being said on your team. Coach made aware and noting done - swept under the rug
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Can’t wait for all the keyboard warriors to return
Welcome “guest”
Welcome “guest”
Re: Alliance 2012 Hockey
Wohoooooooooo! Welcome back MHT!!! Let’s get this rolling. What happened this weekend???EMC123 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:31 pm Can’t wait for all the keyboard warriors to return
Welcome “guest”
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 2021 Views
-
Last post by OHLNewsbot