2016 AAA

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 2016 AAA

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 3:59 pm

We played on OHP and had 3-4 players from TT, 3-4 Reps, 3 -4 JRC. Don’t think it’s Reps or even half Reps.

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 3:39 pm

Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 3:20 pm Yes. NYR did play in CCT and Carnovale league. Great group of kids, great team, Everything is looking good. You don’t need to bring on ego personalities with trying to stack teams like what some they did because the parents will all never be happy thinking their kid should play PP or PK and so the churn will start. It always does.
I love that, I wish more teams were out there built like actual teams. Spring Hockey is brutal right now. Its either "Elite all star teams" or "garbage" in peoples minds.

Also, not responding specifically this guy, but the guy prior to him claiming the person who put the rankings out is "making shit up to fit a narrative". He made it pretty clear that with spring hockey teams, you can NEVER TELL who is fully on the team, and is just one of many things used to do his rankings.

Young Nats = Everest Elite (only some tournaments - they even have their coach)
TM = Pro Hockey (They have thier coach)
WW = Young kings
APR = Junior wings
NYR = Jr Rangers
VK = Something Knights
REPS = OHP

Yes, I am sure not a single one of these is the "full complete team" but, its "mostly" that team. I am sure I am missing some.

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 3:20 pm

Yes. NYR did play in CCT and Carnovale league. Great group of kids, great team, Everything is looking good. You don’t need to bring on ego personalities with trying to stack teams like what some they did because the parents will all never be happy thinking their kid should play PP or PK and so the churn will start. It always does.

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 2:30 pm

Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 1:41 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:26 pm This guy seems out to lunch. Which spring teams are TM, NYR or Reps? I heard someone say it was PH but I saw at least 6 kids that are not on TM.
NYR and Reps definitely dont have spring teams. But the ranking guy needs that to not be true to make these rankings and will come up with some nonsense to justify it all
jr ranger elite with tc as the coach isn't nyr? or edges academy with tc as the coach in carnevale?

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 1:41 pm

Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:26 pm This guy seems out to lunch. Which spring teams are TM, NYR or Reps? I heard someone say it was PH but I saw at least 6 kids that are not on TM.
NYR and Reps definitely dont have spring teams. But the ranking guy needs that to not be true to make these rankings and will come up with some nonsense to justify it all

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 1:21 pm

Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 10:50 am To complete the analysis….

From the Alliance, Brantford will compete with anyone. Basically the draft day elite team that have been competitive at all the big spring tourneys. They will beat some big teams at silver stick, definitely a dark horse to compete with Whitby.

Niagara will be very strong, probably similar to the analysis of Quinte.

Oakville and Burlington both shook up their MD groups and added from outside. Oakville goaltending is probably tops in the province. With solid coaching both could compete with all the tier 2 teams but not at JRC/Marlies/WW/Brantford level.

Rest of OMHA West is quite weak. While the rest of Alliance is dependant on the kids from London and whether they all went to one super team (I haven’t heard one way or another).
Apparently the London kids split up so looks like Brantford will run away with Alliance. They will be better than any omha team in the west at least.

Oakville I heard didn't add much and favored local MD kids over outsiders but idk. Burlington and niagara should be good. Judging by how many showed up to tryouts I'd wager credit river, southern tier and halton are towards the bottom. Hamilton and guelph in the middle. I don't know anything about grey Bruce.

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:54 pm

Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:46 pm Complete nonsense from the guy with time to write 10 paragraphs during a weekday. PH has had few players from other teams like JRC. So how can this be used to evaluate a winter team. VK and Nats had pretty much the winter rosters. Some Tournaments TB has played with JRC roster. The way things look JRC, VK, Nats will be very strong. WW will blow up after a year of being stranded on an island.
Who ever takes home first place, congratulations. Please don't be a douchebag. These are all 10 year olds who just want to play hockey and there's more to it than winning.

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:46 pm

Complete nonsense from the guy with time to write 10 paragraphs during a weekday. PH has had few players from other teams like JRC. So how can this be used to evaluate a winter team. VK and Nats had pretty much the winter rosters. Some Tournaments TB has played with JRC roster. The way things look JRC, VK, Nats will be very strong. WW will blow up after a year of being stranded on an island.

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:26 pm

This guy seems out to lunch. Which spring teams are TM, NYR or Reps? I heard someone say it was PH but I saw at least 6 kids that are not on TM.

Re: 2016 AAA

by Guest » Tue Jun 10, 2025 10:54 am

Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 10:49 am
Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 9:38 am
Guest wrote: Tue Jun 10, 2025 8:42 am
Guest wrote: Mon Jun 09, 2025 6:25 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Jun 09, 2025 5:12 pm TM will probably be the top team with JRC and VK.

The rest will be wide open with the exception of Rebels and nothing should surprise.
The detailed analysis on this site never fails
GTHL: To start the season, this is how it will play out - 5 tiers

TM // JRC
VK // Nats // DMF
TT //SENS
TRW // REPS
MM // Rebels // NYR

- TRW has an opportunity to move up if they get a different coach who knows what hes doing
- VK//Nats // DMF all have an opportunity to play competitive hockey with TM and JRC with good coaching
- REPS will be a totally different team next year when it blows up and OHP lady is told to kick rocks
- NYR are the least toxic team
- TT and SENS both have solid rosters, just simply aren't "Super teams"

OMHA: 5 Tiers as well, this is what the first half of the season will look like.

WW
QRD
YSE // BJC // APR // KING
PETB // COW
NCP // MW // NS

- WW won't have a competitive game against anyone except QRD, who might even squeak out a win against them
- YSE, BJC, APR, KING all have really solid teams with solid coaching should all be competitive with each other. APR might be the first team to drop out of this group.
- NCP as one or two really good players and then dog shit
- MW is a mess
- NS is durham kids left overs after APR/WW/COW all got first pick
- PETB is my sleeper team to possibly come out of no where.

Good luck to everyone!
VK beat DMF 10+ vs nothing in a tournament weeks ago. Any specific reason group them in same tier? Agree with VK and Nats they were close in NYHL games
The specific reason is that this was written by someone who doesnt have a clue and istn paying attention. These rankings are garbage. Quick ignore and move on
Wrong. These rankings are as good as any, you are just a sour grapes parent who's team is somewhere you don't like. Get over it. (I am 99% you are a young nats parent - worst parents in the age group)

Top