Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 11:45 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.

27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.

so can CRC7, 9, 8, 11 and 17

How about CR 4, 22, 33, 65, 72, 77, 84 and 93.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 11:38 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 10:18 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:03 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.

27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.

yeah, 91 can play himself right into a corner!

Tie game in the 3rd period against STA, 91 wasn’t even on their power play. Sensing trouble in CRC Paradise ???

He was probably just on the ice the last 2 minutes, give the kid a breather!

In a tied game???
Ok daddy
Suck it up Buttercup.
Maybe the heads coach was still distracted by the fact that STA wouldn’t do their pre game cheer first, before CRC. Actually complaining to the refs, who he clearly knows by first name, that the STA needed to do theirs first.
What a crybaby.
Need to be better than that bud.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 1:05 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 11:38 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 10:18 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:03 am

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.

27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.

yeah, 91 can play himself right into a corner!

Tie game in the 3rd period against STA, 91 wasn’t even on their power play. Sensing trouble in CRC Paradise ???

He was probably just on the ice the last 2 minutes, give the kid a breather!

In a tied game???
Ok daddy
Suck it up Buttercup.
Maybe the heads coach was still distracted by the fact that STA wouldn’t do their pre game cheer first, before CRC. Actually complaining to the refs, who he clearly knows by first name, that the STA needed to do theirs first.
What a crybaby.
Need to be better than that bud.

Hey Gramps, cut the wobbly juice off, visiting team goes first, you'll have your chance at the end of the playoffs, dont worry fair is fair. Sad thing is, the impact players didn't need to have an impact to win!

My kid is going to play in the G next season, its AA but stil better hocke than OMHA SCTA AAA, when should I start reaching out to agents, and does anybody have any suggestions?

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 1:51 pm My kid is going to play in the G next season, its AA but stil better hocke than OMHA SCTA AAA, when should I start reaching out to agents, and does anybody have any suggestions?

OK, now I know that there are people on here just entertaining themselves with bs comments to see if they can get a response.

Cr 91 can play.
[/quote]

so can CRC7, 9, 8, 11 and 17
[/quote]
How about CR 4, 22, 33, 65, 72, 77, 84 and 93.
[/quote]

CRC 91 is ready to play at the next level, as potentially are 3 to 5 other players on CRC. We haven't seen what a different coach can do with any of their top players, but if rumours are true we will see some changes next year and what happens, happens. Meanwhile the entire CRC team are players in the OMHA West. Let's see who goes on from the West to get beat by the East at the OMHA Finals.

[quote=Guest post_id=199929 time=1741199111]
[quote=Guest post_id=199908 time=1741197948]
[quote=Guest post_id=199834 time=1741192682]
[quote=Guest post_id=199775 time=1741187912]
[quote=Guest post_id=199697 time=1741179833]
[quote=Guest post_id=199604 time=1741144878]


27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.
[/quote]

yeah, 91 can play himself right into a corner!
[/quote]

Tie game in the 3rd period against STA, 91 wasn’t even on their power play. Sensing trouble in CRC Paradise ???
[/quote]

He was probably just on the ice the last 2 minutes, give the kid a breather!
[/quote]

In a tied game???
Ok daddy
Suck it up Buttercup.
Maybe the heads coach was still distracted by the fact that STA wouldn’t do their pre game cheer first, before CRC. Actually complaining to the refs, who he clearly knows by first name, that the STA needed to do theirs first.
What a crybaby.
Need to be better than that bud.
[/quote]

Hey Gramps, cut the wobbly juice off, visiting team goes first, you'll have your chance at the end of the playoffs, dont worry fair is fair. Sad thing is, the impact players didn't need to have an impact to win!
[/quote]

Sad thing is COACH GRAMPS, you felt the need to complain about such an irrelevant part of the game, even before it even started. Then bitched at the refs after the periods because your “impact” players were doing nothing but getting knocked around.
I’ve never seen a coach whine like you.

27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.
[/quote]

yeah, 91 can play himself right into a corner!
[/quote]

Tie game in the 3rd period against STA, 91 wasn’t even on their power play. Sensing trouble in CRC Paradise ???
[/quote]

He was probably just on the ice the last 2 minutes, give the kid a breather!
[/quote]

In a tied game???
Ok daddy
Suck it up Buttercup.
Maybe the heads coach was still distracted by the fact that STA wouldn’t do their pre game cheer first, before CRC. Actually complaining to the refs, who he clearly knows by first name, that the STA needed to do theirs first.
What a crybaby.
Need to be better than that bud.
[/quote]

Hey Gramps, cut the wobbly juice off, visiting team goes first, you'll have your chance at the end of the playoffs, dont worry fair is fair. Sad thing is, the impact players didn't need to have an impact to win!
[/quote]

Sad thing is COACH GRAMPS, you felt the need to complain about such an irrelevant part of the game, even before it even started. Then bitched at the refs after the periods because your “impact” players were doing nothing but getting knocked around.
I’ve never seen a coach whine like you.

Gramps you doing a lot of whining on here. Worried about who cheers first ? If the apple doesnt fall far from the tree, then if shit like this bothers you and your kids than they aren't mentally ready for AAA playoffs. Who gives 2 shits about who cheers first.
All coaches whine!
And which one of the 17 impact players were doing nothing. Please enlighten us? Scored 4 goals in a playoff game against you guys. That seems impactful to me.

Im predicting a low scoring CRC/ Guelph game, CRC winners but a scare. "impact" players will be on the sideline

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Mar 06, 2025 12:14 pm Im predicting a low scoring CRC/ Guelph game, CRC winners but a scare. "impact" players will be on the sideline

Both of them?!