2010 Alliance

Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:14 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 8:35 am
Guest wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 7:04 pm anything happening with Waterloo, Kitchener and Cambridge ????? Besides the octagon kids going to WW ( whoever they actually are ...
I still want to know what an "Octagon Kid" is. :lol:

I know kids on all 3 of those teams and the only ones staying are the ones who think they cant make another team. There are kids on those teams talking to multiple teams.
If you dont know what an ocagon kid is do you even follow minor hockey
After 20 years involved in Minor hockey.....I guess I am not as well versed as you. My humble apologies :lol: .
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:35 am
Guest wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:24 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 8:40 am Waterloo is going to be in trouble ... wonder why everyone is leaving :shock:

Waterloo has doubled up , only upgrades coming in
Will give london a go for 1st . Tons of G kids coming in
upgrades :? .. 4 D jumping ship .. only left are with an ego, and a 6thD.. I wouldnt call kids from kitch and cambridge "upgrades"
I heard on 2 D were jumping ship. Everyone thinks the grass is greener elsewhere. Good luck!

It is only greener if you can get out of Cambridge. Coach is promising the world to whoever stays. They are going to be no different.
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Any team is greener when you get away from a toxic dressing room and parent group. Especially when its parents calling the shots
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Mar 24, 2025 11:16 am London will be the team once again, just taking in everyone in the London area from Sarnia and EC that are good.

99ers wait and see as the goalie is leaving and few other players

SCP set to loss few players but add a few. Too 3 to be the same
Who is leaving from B99ers? Proof?
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

[quote=Guest post_id=209782 time=1743078257]
[quote=Guest post_id=208198 time=1742829413]
London will be the team once again, just taking in everyone in the London area from Sarnia and EC that are good.

99ers wait and see as the goalie is leaving and few other players

SCP set to loss few players but add a few. Too 3 to be the same
[/quote]

Who is leaving from B99ers? Proof?
[/quote]

The only people leaving Brantford are the kids that shouldn't of been on the team in the first place .

Hearing a goalie is demanding more starts then the other .. must of not liked he had heard another interested in HP and didn't want to compete for a spot there .
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

8-2. Good thing HP building an elite super team. Can't lose that bad or everyone gonna go back to Sarnia, EMC, Kitchener, Sun County, The moon etc.
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

lol how'd them apples taste!! 7-2 beat down by Sarnia. Not good look for a goalie looking to demand extra starts.
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:15 am lol how'd them apples taste!! 7-2 beat down by Sarnia. Not good look for a goalie looking to demand extra starts.
Maybe it was an F U to the coach for not playing against HP .. Makes sense for Brantford coach to play the other knowing TVH is looking to go to HP ..
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:42 am
Guest wrote: Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:15 am lol how'd them apples taste!! 7-2 beat down by Sarnia. Not good look for a goalie looking to demand extra starts.
Maybe it was an F U to the coach for not playing against HP .. Makes sense for Brantford coach to play the other knowing TVH is looking to go to HP ..
Does anyone think Brooks isn't looking at that game and questioning whether he wants TVH? That was bad.
Guest

Re: 2010 Alliance

Post by Guest »

Making Da Costa look that much better of a choice ..

But also HP#1 had a crap game and was pulled against London
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post