LF picked up a few FH playersGuest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:59 pmLooks accurate. Are TR and LF starting from scratch or do LF at least have their 2 strong F guys?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 2:19 pm Looks like there will be 3 groups next year:
Teams that stayed consistent with some changes around the edges:
- EE
- NT
- WH
- SYB
Teams that have had major changes and will come down to coaching and their ability to gel:
- GP
- NYK
- FH
- MI
Teams that will struggle to find their way:
- LF
- TR
2010 GTHL AA East
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
That only helps if they kept their 2 only scorers. If not it puts them in the same situation as TR. starting from scratch.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:59 pmLF picked up a few FH playersGuest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:59 pmLooks accurate. Are TR and LF starting from scratch or do LF at least have their 2 strong F guys?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 2:19 pm Looks like there will be 3 groups next year:
Teams that stayed consistent with some changes around the edges:
- EE
- NT
- WH
- SYB
Teams that have had major changes and will come down to coaching and their ability to gel:
- GP
- NYK
- FH
- MI
Teams that will struggle to find their way:
- LF
- TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
I don’t think WH is in that top group anymore.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:26 pmThat only helps if they kept their 2 only scorers. If not it puts them in the same situation as TR. starting from scratch.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:59 pmLF picked up a few FH playersGuest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:59 pmLooks accurate. Are TR and LF starting from scratch or do LF at least have their 2 strong F guys?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 2:19 pm Looks like there will be 3 groups next year:
Teams that stayed consistent with some changes around the edges:
- EE
- NT
- WH
- SYB
Teams that have had major changes and will come down to coaching and their ability to gel:
- GP
- NYK
- FH
- MI
Teams that will struggle to find their way:
- LF
- TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
WH should finish around the same spot but didn’t get better with all the reported changes. Lost both goalies including one of top goalies in loop. NYK replacement should be good but not same caliber. Lack of D depth exposed in playoffs won’t change - swapped out skilled D for more size unless more changes coming to replace bottom pairing at tryouts - D won’t be stronger. Lost a strong forward but apparently another NYK top forward coming in so should be about the same.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 9:11 pmI don’t think WH is in that top group anymore.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:26 pmThat only helps if they kept their 2 only scorers. If not it puts them in the same situation as TR. starting from scratch.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:59 pmLF picked up a few FH playersGuest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:59 pmLooks accurate. Are TR and LF starting from scratch or do LF at least have their 2 strong F guys?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 2:19 pm Looks like there will be 3 groups next year:
Teams that stayed consistent with some changes around the edges:
- EE
- NT
- WH
- SYB
Teams that have had major changes and will come down to coaching and their ability to gel:
- GP
- NYK
- FH
- MI
Teams that will struggle to find their way:
- LF
- TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
NT, SYB, EE batttle for the top.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:26 amWH should finish around the same spot but didn’t get better with all the reported changes. Lost both goalies including one of top goalies in loop. NYK replacement should be good but not same caliber. Lack of D depth exposed in playoffs won’t change - swapped out skilled D for more size unless more changes coming to replace bottom pairing at tryouts - D won’t be stronger. Lost a strong forward but apparently another NYK top forward coming in so should be about the same.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 9:11 pmI don’t think WH is in that top group anymore.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:26 pmThat only helps if they kept their 2 only scorers. If not it puts them in the same situation as TR. starting from scratch.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:59 pmLF picked up a few FH playersGuest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:59 pmLooks accurate. Are TR and LF starting from scratch or do LF at least have their 2 strong F guys?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 2:19 pm Looks like there will be 3 groups next year:
Teams that stayed consistent with some changes around the edges:
- EE
- NT
- WH
- SYB
Teams that have had major changes and will come down to coaching and their ability to gel:
- GP
- NYK
- FH
- MI
Teams that will struggle to find their way:
- LF
- TR
WH will improve as forwards are better but stay at 4/5, NYK will drop down to bottom group with changes. FH similar, GP similar not sure of changes, MI was the most improved team last year but probably similar spot, TR & LF battle for last but TR should improve a bit
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
I thought LF picked up a few AAA players. That should make them better. They were competitive all year. These additions can’t make them worse.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:05 pmNT, SYB, EE batttle for the top.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:26 amWH should finish around the same spot but didn’t get better with all the reported changes. Lost both goalies including one of top goalies in loop. NYK replacement should be good but not same caliber. Lack of D depth exposed in playoffs won’t change - swapped out skilled D for more size unless more changes coming to replace bottom pairing at tryouts - D won’t be stronger. Lost a strong forward but apparently another NYK top forward coming in so should be about the same.
WH will improve as forwards are better but stay at 4/5, NYK will drop down to bottom group with changes. FH similar, GP similar not sure of changes, MI was the most improved team last year but probably similar spot, TR & LF battle for last but TR should improve a bit
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
Lost a top G that they couldn't replace. Lost a skilled D that they didn't replace. Lost a strong F that they did replace. Sounds like they will be lucky if they don't drop.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:26 amWH should finish around the same spot but didn’t get better with all the reported changes. Lost both goalies including one of top goalies in loop. NYK replacement should be good but not same caliber. Lack of D depth exposed in playoffs won’t change - swapped out skilled D for more size unless more changes coming to replace bottom pairing at tryouts - D won’t be stronger. Lost a strong forward but apparently another NYK top forward coming in so should be about the same.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 9:11 pmI don’t think WH is in that top group anymore.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:26 pmThat only helps if they kept their 2 only scorers. If not it puts them in the same situation as TR. starting from scratch.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 5:59 pmLF picked up a few FH playersGuest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 3:59 pmLooks accurate. Are TR and LF starting from scratch or do LF at least have their 2 strong F guys?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 2:19 pm Looks like there will be 3 groups next year:
Teams that stayed consistent with some changes around the edges:
- EE
- NT
- WH
- SYB
Teams that have had major changes and will come down to coaching and their ability to gel:
- GP
- NYK
- FH
- MI
Teams that will struggle to find their way:
- LF
- TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
GP lost quite a few of their best players. Not sure what they replaced them with. likely weaker.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:11 pmI thought LF picked up a few AAA players. That should make them better. They were competitive all year. These additions can’t make them worse.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:05 pmNT, SYB, EE batttle for the top.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:26 amWH should finish around the same spot but didn’t get better with all the reported changes. Lost both goalies including one of top goalies in loop. NYK replacement should be good but not same caliber. Lack of D depth exposed in playoffs won’t change - swapped out skilled D for more size unless more changes coming to replace bottom pairing at tryouts - D won’t be stronger. Lost a strong forward but apparently another NYK top forward coming in so should be about the same.
WH will improve as forwards are better but stay at 4/5, NYK will drop down to bottom group with changes. FH similar, GP similar not sure of changes, MI was the most improved team last year but probably similar spot, TR & LF battle for last but TR should improve a bit
NYK is rebuild with only a handful going back also. Likely weaker.
MI likely lost their 40 goal scorer, so will need to replace that. Likely a little weaker.
SYB likely improved on strong additions. improved.
FH likely lots of changes with a few going to LF. likely the same.
LF may surprise as they have some AAA's coming and FH players. Likely better.
TR likely bottom again. Not sure where they stand. Can't be worse.
Top teams: SYB/EE, then NT/WH
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
TR looking for players. Posted today on MHL>>Guest wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 10:04 amGP lost quite a few of their best players. Not sure what they replaced them with. likely weaker.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:11 pmI thought LF picked up a few AAA players. That should make them better. They were competitive all year. These additions can’t make them worse.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:05 pmNT, SYB, EE batttle for the top.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:26 amWH should finish around the same spot but didn’t get better with all the reported changes. Lost both goalies including one of top goalies in loop. NYK replacement should be good but not same caliber. Lack of D depth exposed in playoffs won’t change - swapped out skilled D for more size unless more changes coming to replace bottom pairing at tryouts - D won’t be stronger. Lost a strong forward but apparently another NYK top forward coming in so should be about the same.
WH will improve as forwards are better but stay at 4/5, NYK will drop down to bottom group with changes. FH similar, GP similar not sure of changes, MI was the most improved team last year but probably similar spot, TR & LF battle for last but TR should improve a bit
NYK is rebuild with only a handful going back also. Likely weaker.
MI likely lost their 40 goal scorer, so will need to replace that. Likely a little weaker.
SYB likely improved on strong additions. improved.
FH likely lots of changes with a few going to LF. likely the same.
LF may surprise as they have some AAA's coming and FH players. Likely better.
TR likely bottom again. Not sure where they stand. Can't be worse.
Top teams: SYB/EE, then NT/WH
Ted Reeve 2010AA GTHL East Players Wanted
Post by Guest » Tue Apr 22, 2025 1:03 pm
New coach and program looking for competitive players. New coach has been coaching AAA for a number of years. Young and professional. We will have a high level program with lots of great training. Please reach out to coach with contact info on the TR website.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
GP lost only a few playersGuest wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 10:04 amGP lost quite a few of their best players. Not sure what they replaced them with. likely weaker.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:11 pmI thought LF picked up a few AAA players. That should make them better. They were competitive all year. These additions can’t make them worse.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:05 pmNT, SYB, EE batttle for the top.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:26 amWH should finish around the same spot but didn’t get better with all the reported changes. Lost both goalies including one of top goalies in loop. NYK replacement should be good but not same caliber. Lack of D depth exposed in playoffs won’t change - swapped out skilled D for more size unless more changes coming to replace bottom pairing at tryouts - D won’t be stronger. Lost a strong forward but apparently another NYK top forward coming in so should be about the same.
WH will improve as forwards are better but stay at 4/5, NYK will drop down to bottom group with changes. FH similar, GP similar not sure of changes, MI was the most improved team last year but probably similar spot, TR & LF battle for last but TR should improve a bit
NYK is rebuild with only a handful going back also. Likely weaker.
MI likely lost their 40 goal scorer, so will need to replace that. Likely a little weaker.
SYB likely improved on strong additions. improved.
FH likely lots of changes with a few going to LF. likely the same.
LF may surprise as they have some AAA's coming and FH players. Likely better.
TR likely bottom again. Not sure where they stand. Can't be worse.
Top teams: SYB/EE, then NT/WH
NYK not a rebuild but lost a few players
MI much improved. Cut the player referred to here
SYB much improved. Cut some bad attitudes
FH hard to say but lost a lot
LF AAA? Not sure they were AAA to begin with
TR 0-34
NT Great pickups. My pick to win it all
WH NYK pickups hard to say what they do
EE Some players want out due to parent coach. We will see
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 13875 Views
-
Last post by ShoulderCheck