Handful of AAA kids helped us and did all the damage vs RJM which is MNS.
2015 AA
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
Embarrassed by a 2016 team yesterday they called up AAA ringers to play MN and MNS. Imagine how small of a d*ck you need for that
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
Evolve roster has changed multiple times since the tournament started. I am sure that’s totally above board.
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
Evolve without those kid couldn’t beat a 2016 teamGuest wrote: ↑Sat May 03, 2025 3:21 pmEvolve roster has changed multiple times since the tournament started. I am sure that’s totally above board.
MB and MNS tied 4-4
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
Overall, it was a good game. MNS are in excellent physical form right now — it felt like they could’ve kept up the tempo for another 30 minutes. Tactically, they were also very sharp, especially on defense. Big up to the coach. MB looked good too, but it seemed like the kids are already in vacation mode. If the coaches focus on team play and hockey IQ over the summer, they could be real title contenders.
Next season should be super competitive — any of five teams could take it. It’ll be great to play on any of them.
I’d wish adding NYK and NT to the five western teams+ Sens, TRW, Rebels and maybe 2–3 OMHA AAA or top AA teams. It would make sense to create a separate AA+ / AAA- division.
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
MB, FT and MNS will be the top 3 teams in the west. And they will be very competitive with each other if rosters stay as they are right now. Observations:
Goaltending - FT has the edge over the other two. Goalie is big, moves well and isn’t afraid to come out of the net. Doesn’t give up many rebounds. MB and MNS look about the same but give the edge to MB due to goalie’s big size difference. This could be a problem for MNS as they only had 1 goalie dress?
Speed - MNS easily because their D as a group are very fast. Forwards are more evenly matched. MNS 19 is the fastest of any of the kids but MNS also has some snails hiding on bottom lines. FT is faster than MB, everyone is good.
Size - FT and MB tie. MNS has gotten bigger but not big enough.
Forwards - FT has the most depth based on what I saw. Their top forwards are also bigger. MNS second. MB hasn’t replaced their best player 11 with somebody as good.
Defence - MNS by a country mile. Not on their team but if we’re honest there are at least 2 if not 3 D they have that are better than anyone on MB or FT. Credit to their D coach, that guy is running a tight and unmatched ship. MB is next, FT last.
Coaching - MNS and MB tie. Both teams are playing a game that looks like hockey starts to look in U12-13. FT relies on individual strength but is not pretty to watch.
Overall? Probably FT.
Goaltending - FT has the edge over the other two. Goalie is big, moves well and isn’t afraid to come out of the net. Doesn’t give up many rebounds. MB and MNS look about the same but give the edge to MB due to goalie’s big size difference. This could be a problem for MNS as they only had 1 goalie dress?
Speed - MNS easily because their D as a group are very fast. Forwards are more evenly matched. MNS 19 is the fastest of any of the kids but MNS also has some snails hiding on bottom lines. FT is faster than MB, everyone is good.
Size - FT and MB tie. MNS has gotten bigger but not big enough.
Forwards - FT has the most depth based on what I saw. Their top forwards are also bigger. MNS second. MB hasn’t replaced their best player 11 with somebody as good.
Defence - MNS by a country mile. Not on their team but if we’re honest there are at least 2 if not 3 D they have that are better than anyone on MB or FT. Credit to their D coach, that guy is running a tight and unmatched ship. MB is next, FT last.
Coaching - MNS and MB tie. Both teams are playing a game that looks like hockey starts to look in U12-13. FT relies on individual strength but is not pretty to watch.
Overall? Probably FT.
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
Great post!Guest wrote: ↑Sat May 03, 2025 8:41 pmOverall, it was a good game. MNS are in excellent physical form right now — it felt like they could’ve kept up the tempo for another 30 minutes. Tactically, they were also very sharp, especially on defense. Big up to the coach. MB looked good too, but it seemed like the kids are already in vacation mode. If the coaches focus on team play and hockey IQ over the summer, they could be real title contenders.
Next season should be super competitive — any of five teams could take it. It’ll be great to play on any of them.
I’d wish adding NYK and NT to the five western teams+ Sens, TRW, Rebels and maybe 2–3 OMHA AAA or top AA teams. It would make sense to create a separate AA+ / AAA- division.
It was a good game and very high quality hockey. The top of the west loop is very bright for U11. These teams will push each other to get better every day.
And I agree that they should have a separate level. Because the top of U11 will be so good we will probably not have 1-2 Jets/Terriers but 3-4. Unfortunate for everyone in the loop !
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
MB are garbageGuest wrote: ↑Sat May 03, 2025 9:16 pm MB, FT and MNS will be the top 3 teams in the west. And they will be very competitive with each other if rosters stay as they are right now. Observations:
Goaltending - FT has the edge over the other two. Goalie is big, moves well and isn’t afraid to come out of the net. Doesn’t give up many rebounds. MB and MNS look about the same but give the edge to MB due to goalie’s big size difference. This could be a problem for MNS as they only had 1 goalie dress?
Speed - MNS easily because their D as a group are very fast. Forwards are more evenly matched. MNS 19 is the fastest of any of the kids but MNS also has some snails hiding on bottom lines. FT is faster than MB, everyone is good.
Size - FT and MB tie. MNS has gotten bigger but not big enough.
Forwards - FT has the most depth based on what I saw. Their top forwards are also bigger. MNS second. MB hasn’t replaced their best player 11 with somebody as good.
Defence - MNS by a country mile. Not on their team but if we’re honest there are at least 2 if not 3 D they have that are better than anyone on MB or FT. Credit to their D coach, that guy is running a tight and unmatched ship. MB is next, FT last.
Coaching - MNS and MB tie. Both teams are playing a game that looks like hockey starts to look in U12-13. FT relies on individual strength but is not pretty to watch.
Overall? Probably FT.
Their AAA grab is non existent
Small group not a lot of speed
Parent group are tools
-
Guest
Re: 2015 AA
LMFAO Evolve changed their roster again for their fourth game. At least one more random AAA kid added who hasn’t played all weekend.Guest wrote: ↑Sat May 03, 2025 3:21 pmEvolve roster has changed multiple times since the tournament started. I am sure that’s totally above board.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post