by Guest » Mon May 05, 2025 9:01 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 7:20 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 5:53 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 1:40 pm
Guest wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 1:11 pm
GF vs GA from this weekend
MNS 27–12
FT 19-11
MB 17-20
One of these teams is not like the other two …
I will repeat myself, the changes on D for MNS give them such a potent advantage over the rest of the league. 1-6 are solid unlike last year they really only had the top 2 who they could rely on. Those 2 are now a pairing and might just be the top 2 D in the loop.
Upfront they have brought in some very very strong talent.
Goalie is as solid as they come.
No weak links in the lineup
They won a tourney this weekend without even holding a team practice yet. Wait to see this team in October.
MNS=Problem!
You've all been warned.
2 of the Klevr kids who left MNS last year prior to the league deadline were on the Fast hockey team that beat the MB yesterday lmao. MB lost to a bunch of 2016s lol
Maybe MNS’s defense is solid and the goalies are good—hard to say. But that night, Beast was super relaxed, without structured team play and even the head coach was absent. yet still managed to score 3 or 4 goals mostly through individual skill.
Beast’s forwards were noticeably faster, more creative, and more powerful than your defense. More than once, a single forward skated through 2–3 defenders—where normally, you’d expect defenders to shut that down 9 times out of 10. In the corners, our forwards often left your D’s scrambling or even down on the ice.
That said, your attack is still good as well as general physical conditions, though 2-3 goals were scored when we had 3-4 kids on ice. Nevertheless #19 stands out, #12 brings good speed, and #10 isn’t bad either. If you think it’s right to a team of 10 year olds to be built around 1 kid, it’s up to you. But general rule it’s good only for that kid (sometimes but not always) and coach as it gives quick results for a while.
Lol yaaaaaaaa ok pal
Not sure what game you were watching. MNS was up 4-1 and then got bored. Your AAA kid didnt touch the puck all game. Your D is soft other than the big kid. Your forwards other than the kid you lost to OMHA AAA are slow and not very creative. Hopefully we see you again with our full squad as a couple kids were missing.
East parents gone make your own thread!
Sometimes the score isn’t reflective of gameplay
MNS outshot MB 32-14 and that total is being generous to MB.
If it was just one game, I wouldn’t read too much into it.
But that shot count aligns with the other results we saw from MB throughout the weekend.
[quote=Guest post_id=222151 time=1746487233]
[quote=Guest post_id=222133 time=1746482021]
[quote=Guest post_id=222083 time=1746466813]
[quote=Guest post_id=222075 time=1746465115]
GF vs GA from this weekend
MNS 27–12
FT 19-11
MB 17-20
One of these teams is not like the other two …
[/quote]
I will repeat myself, the changes on D for MNS give them such a potent advantage over the rest of the league. 1-6 are solid unlike last year they really only had the top 2 who they could rely on. Those 2 are now a pairing and might just be the top 2 D in the loop.
Upfront they have brought in some very very strong talent.
Goalie is as solid as they come.
No weak links in the lineup
They won a tourney this weekend without even holding a team practice yet. Wait to see this team in October.
MNS=Problem!
You've all been warned.
2 of the Klevr kids who left MNS last year prior to the league deadline were on the Fast hockey team that beat the MB yesterday lmao. MB lost to a bunch of 2016s lol
[/quote]
Maybe MNS’s defense is solid and the goalies are good—hard to say. But that night, Beast was super relaxed, without structured team play and even the head coach was absent. yet still managed to score 3 or 4 goals mostly through individual skill.
Beast’s forwards were noticeably faster, more creative, and more powerful than your defense. More than once, a single forward skated through 2–3 defenders—where normally, you’d expect defenders to shut that down 9 times out of 10. In the corners, our forwards often left your D’s scrambling or even down on the ice.
That said, your attack is still good as well as general physical conditions, though 2-3 goals were scored when we had 3-4 kids on ice. Nevertheless #19 stands out, #12 brings good speed, and #10 isn’t bad either. If you think it’s right to a team of 10 year olds to be built around 1 kid, it’s up to you. But general rule it’s good only for that kid (sometimes but not always) and coach as it gives quick results for a while.
[/quote]
Lol yaaaaaaaa ok pal
Not sure what game you were watching. MNS was up 4-1 and then got bored. Your AAA kid didnt touch the puck all game. Your D is soft other than the big kid. Your forwards other than the kid you lost to OMHA AAA are slow and not very creative. Hopefully we see you again with our full squad as a couple kids were missing.
East parents gone make your own thread!
[/quote]
Sometimes the score isn’t reflective of gameplay
MNS outshot MB 32-14 and that total is being generous to MB.
If it was just one game, I wouldn’t read too much into it.
But that shot count aligns with the other results we saw from MB throughout the weekend.