A new place to talk about minor hockey in North America & Around the World. Jump in to the Minor Hockey Talk forum and discuss everything about Hockey in Canada & Hockey in the USA
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
VK are not all that take a pill and calm down. 2011 is known to be a weak age group. I have 3 boys 2 play AAA and 1 plays AA and I know from watching and not being stupid that 2011 is a weak age group. NOBODY from this chat will have a 2011 kid drafted period the end of conversation. The parents on here constantly blabbing because their Johnny is on a top 2011 team can just take a step back and shut the fu*k up regardless of what team you're on you ass clowns.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
VK are not all that take a pill and calm down. 2011 is known to be a weak age group. I have 3 boys 2 play AAA and 1 plays AA and I know from watching and not being stupid that 2011 is a weak age group. NOBODY from this chat will have a 2011 kid drafted period the end of conversation. The parents on here constantly blabbing because their Johnny is on a top 2011 team can just take a step back and shut the fu*k up regardless of what team you're on you ass clowns.
Somebody’s jealous! The 2011 group is the shaping up to be the strongest of the past few drafts. Ask the scouts what they’re saying. Oh ya, they don’t talk to you
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
Guest wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 1:09 pm
What coach in this loop would not cut you in a second. Loyalty is non existent in hockey parents. Just find the best team your kid can play on and realize it is a 12 month commitment. Find a team that wins, we played on a horrible team last year and losing is demoralizing. You can argue development, no chance. Go to a team that wins more than they lose. kid will want to improve if the kids around him are good.
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
You can call what ever you want. Then there’s the truth. Why wouldn’t a top kid want to go there? There’s tons of room for improvement and opportunity to excel. Unfortunately some parents don’t want your kid to surpass theirs. Top 3 and competitive no need to rock the boat. Look at what’s coming in? Good players willing to play behind the kids mentioned.
My kid plays up a year and smokes these pylons in 4 years!
tm coach doesnt cut kids. 10 still from minor atom. 5 from tyke. thats impressive
The ones from tyke shouldn't still be there. They are holding that team back big time. TM could be a real contender.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
You can call what ever you want. Then there’s the truth. Why wouldn’t a top kid want to go there? There’s tons of room for improvement and opportunity to excel. Unfortunately some parents don’t want your kid to surpass theirs. Top 3 and competitive no need to rock the boat. Look at what’s coming in? Good players willing to play behind the kids mentioned.
My kid plays up a year and smokes these pylons in 4 years!
The only thing your kid will be smoking are blunts.
3 kids parents hold the team back and it’s not the coaches buddies. #84 #19 #88 parents control JB. Top players that want in have to go through these 3 parents blessing. Top kids that will threaten their kids ice time and play will never be brought in to bump their kids down the depth chart. Don’t be fooled by the theatrics.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
Wouldn’t***
84’s parents on TM will never allow your kid come on if there’s any chance of pushing him down the depth chart. Coaches buddies are perfect willing to sit and watch with no push back. This is all by design! Wake up JB is controlled.
I call BS. Which ‘top kids’ wanted to go to Tm and were told no?
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
Wouldn’t***
84’s parents on TM will never allow your kid come on if there’s any chance of pushing him down the depth chart. Coaches buddies are perfect willing to sit and watch with no push back. This is all by design! Wake up JB is controlled.
This is true. Some top kids were looking to join TM for next year (I mean top as in would threaten 91/19/84 icetime) and they somehow instead ended up on VK. Can't blame the boys club - all they want is to get their kids drafted early. Doesn't say much for adversity though. Instead they bring in cuts form JRC/VK.
Makes sense if true. If you had a top kid that can make others around you better and looking to move to a top team, Marlies is it and not VK. Look at top 3 on both teams. VK 19, 10 and 11. TM 84, 19 and 91. Where is there a better opportunity if you believe for your kid?
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
Wouldn’t***
84’s parents on TM will never allow your kid come on if there’s any chance of pushing him down the depth chart. Coaches buddies are perfect willing to sit and watch with no push back. This is all by design! Wake up JB is controlled.
This is true. Some top kids were looking to join TM for next year (I mean top as in would threaten 91/19/84 icetime) and they somehow instead ended up on VK. Can't blame the boys club - all they want is to get their kids drafted early. Doesn't say much for adversity though. Instead they bring in cuts form JRC/VK.
Wait until they hear that JB is going with 10 forwards. Tm kaboom
That TM line would be 3rd line on VK. Crazy when u think about it.
I would say third let’s be realistic 3 kids on TM very good.
Wouldn’t***
84’s parents on TM will never allow your kid come on if there’s any chance of pushing him down the depth chart. Coaches buddies are perfect willing to sit and watch with no push back. This is all by design! Wake up JB is controlled.
This is true. Some top kids were looking to join TM for next year (I mean top as in would threaten 91/19/84 icetime) and they somehow instead ended up on VK. Can't blame the boys club - all they want is to get their kids drafted early. Doesn't say much for adversity though. Instead they bring in cuts form JRC/VK.
Wait until they hear that JB is going with 10 forwards. Tm kaboom
Another player to watch 91, 84 and 19. 84 threatens to leave if you bring in someone to challenge kids minutes. Just kids to stay competitive enough to compete in the top 3. Anyway good luck to the ones incoming there’s room in the top 6 but assure yourself no valuable minutes are up for grabs.
