2011 AAA
Re: 2011 AAA
True. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pmAnd ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:11 pmGuest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 11:59 amNats have two. One of them is the coaches son, so technically, they only have one
Nats are irrelevant, and really so are the other 8 teams.
The only three in conversation would be the top three.
It’s impressive that TM has carried 10 orginal players with 6 from the novice year, which to me sounds like a well rounded team.
Re: 2011 AAA
Best and most honest post ever. All the short kid in two years will rule hockey. The smaller the team the more likely to be a u16 powerhouse.
Will be interesting to see how a season of getting smashed by the early growers will translate into getting into the nhl.
Will be interesting to see how a season of getting smashed by the early growers will translate into getting into the nhl.
Re: 2011 AAA
It is actually true , you need to get educated.Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:41 pmTrue. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pmAnd ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:11 pm
Nats are irrelevant, and really so are the other 8 teams.
The only three in conversation would be the top three.
It’s impressive that TM has carried 10 orginal players with 6 from the novice year, which to me sounds like a well rounded team.
Award-winning athletes were more likely to be born late in the selection year than early in the year,” wrote Paul Ford and Mark Williams, the authors of the study. “The relatively younger athletes in our sample were able to stay in a developmental system that discriminated against them.” The authors suggested that “to survive in the system, relatively younger athletes must develop some other performance advantage, which is likely to be skill and its attributes, such as speed, technique and decision making. During their development, these younger athletes may benefit further in skill acquisition by playing the sport with relatively older athletes.”
Re: 2011 AAA
Oakville? The group that lost to Quinte in Pittsburgh last weekend? OK, good luck.Guest wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 5:25 pmOR1 you’re not even mid pack G.
Get lost, you’re no longer allowed to post in here lol
Re: 2011 AAA
Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:37 pm With direct lines for getting your kid there if you sign
Haha…. Sign me up coach.
Re: 2011 AAA
Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:48 pm Best and most honest post ever. All the short kid in two years will rule hockey. The smaller the team the more likely to be a u16 powerhouse.
Will be interesting to see how a season of getting smashed by the early growers will translate into getting into the nhl.
Hmmm ME HIT YOU......... OHHH YOU 2 FAST....ME MISS & BREAK FACE!
Re: 2011 AAA
And who is Tim Ford and Mark Williams?Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:54 pmIt is actually true , you need to get educated.Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 2:41 pmTrue. Just like the kids in special ed usually end up at Harvard.Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:40 pmAnd ironically the likelihood of anyone making it from the top 3 teams is negligibly. There is a better chance of late maturation kids going much further. Junior and out for the early growers!Guest wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 1:11 pm
Nats are irrelevant, and really so are the other 8 teams.
The only three in conversation would be the top three.
It’s impressive that TM has carried 10 orginal players with 6 from the novice year, which to me sounds like a well rounded team.
Award-winning athletes were more likely to be born late in the selection year than early in the year,” wrote Paul Ford and Mark Williams, the authors of the study. “The relatively younger athletes in our sample were able to stay in a developmental system that discriminated against them.” The authors suggested that “to survive in the system, relatively younger athletes must develop some other performance advantage, which is likely to be skill and its attributes, such as speed, technique and decision making. During their development, these younger athletes may benefit further in skill acquisition by playing the sport with relatively older athletes.”
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 11653 Views
-
Last post by 2011needagoalie