Scta 2010

Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 4:42 pm
Guest wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 4:01 pm You goof, this is CRC jealousy not CRC parent group, CRC punched their OMHA ticket yesterday
CRC always make the OMHA’s. They just do nothing when they get there. #SundayisforChurch
Just received some interesting news from BE coach, team will jump a few spots next season and make a good run for things, CRC perhaps hurt themselves
[/quote]

How did CRC hurt themselves?
[/quote]

When a fish makes a comment just begging for a response why bother tapping on the glass?? No need to ask because all you get is a smart ass insult in return.
[/quote]

Its me again, and yes its true, CRC has shot themselves in the foot with players lost and a surprise player on the way out. They dont have enough newcomers that will fill the voids
[/quote]

He ain't going anywhere and he's playing the BE coach and he bit the bait. Unless he's being cut than that makes sense and CRC will have a list of players coming. Anyone is replaceable so no worries from the staff.
[/quote]

BE would have to get a lot more than one kid from cr to make a run at anything
[/quote]

have you watched any hockey this season? BE has a top scorer, compete with top teams, a few supporting players and that team is another CRC
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.


Thanks for that info dad, was that the one hilight for that game?

Cmon Gramps! Be better. It was a good game up.and down by both teams and here you are cutting up kids. If it was only 1 highlight , damn the kid picked a good time to.show up!
See you in a couple.of weeks.
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

You goof, this is CRC jealousy not CRC parent group, CRC punched their OMHA ticket yesterday
[/quote]

CRC always make the OMHA’s. They just do nothing when they get there. #SundayisforChurch
[/quote]

Just received some interesting news from BE coach, team will jump a few spots next season and make a good run for things, CRC perhaps hurt themselves
[/quote]

How did CRC hurt themselves?
[/quote]

When a fish makes a comment just begging for a response why bother tapping on the glass?? No need to ask because all you get is a smart ass insult in return.
[/quote]

Its me again, and yes its true, CRC has shot themselves in the foot with players lost and a surprise player on the way out. They dont have enough newcomers that will fill the voids
[/quote]

He ain't going anywhere and he's playing the BE coach and he bit the bait. Unless he's being cut than that makes sense and CRC will have a list of players coming. Anyone is replaceable so no worries from the staff.
[/quote]

BE would have to get a lot more than one kid from cr to make a run at anything
[/quote]

have you watched any hockey this season? BE has a top scorer, compete with top teams, a few supporting players and that team is another CRC

They lost to Guelph and NYR..both teams ranked in the 50s.
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:40 am
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:22 am
Guest wrote: Mon Mar 03, 2025 8:27 pm You goof, this is CRC jealousy not CRC parent group, CRC punched their OMHA ticket yesterday
CRC always make the OMHA’s. They just do nothing when they get there. #SundayisforChurch
Just received some interesting news from BE coach, team will jump a few spots next season and make a good run for things, CRC perhaps hurt themselves
How did CRC hurt themselves?
[/quote]

When a fish makes a comment just begging for a response why bother tapping on the glass?? No need to ask because all you get is a smart ass insult in return.
[/quote]

Its me again, and yes its true, CRC has shot themselves in the foot with players lost and a surprise player on the way out. They dont have enough newcomers that will fill the voids
[/quote]

He ain't going anywhere and he's playing the BE coach and he bit the bait. Unless he's being cut than that makes sense and CRC will have a list of players coming. Anyone is replaceable so no worries from the staff.
[/quote]

BE would have to get a lot more than one kid from cr to make a run at anything
[/quote]

Hey coach this kid wasn’t cut and sure as shit he will take that team to a new level!
[/quote]

Unless it’s 91 it doesn’t matter.

Previous post is a delusional dad.

And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.
[/quote]

LOL have you seen 91 do anything during any big game?
[/quote]

he does lots of great things vs the same boring OMHA teams, same move over and over again.
[/quote]
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.
27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

See you next year Burlington!
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.
27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.
yeah, 91 can play himself right into a corner!
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:03 am
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.
27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.
yeah, 91 can play himself right into a corner!
Tie game in the 3rd period against STA, 91 wasn’t even on their power play. Sensing trouble in CRC Paradise ???
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 10:18 am
Guest wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:03 am
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.
27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.
yeah, 91 can play himself right into a corner!
Tie game in the 3rd period against STA, 91 wasn’t even on their power play. Sensing trouble in CRC Paradise ???
He was probably just on the ice the last 2 minutes, give the kid a breather!
Guest

Re: Scta 2010

Post by Guest »

Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 10:21 pm
Guest wrote: Tue Mar 04, 2025 11:18 am And 91 is good but he needs linemates to make things happen for him. The OT vs STA the new kid from Sudbury was the kid handling the puck for over 30 seconds before the OT goal. 91 gets credit for going to the net and scoring the ugly goal but the kid (#8) did most the work to get the goal.


Liar. 8 wasn’t even on the ice. Need people to pass in ot


That whole shift was a disaster! Not a single shot hit the net, great blocks by STA players and a rediculous shot miles over the net ended up on 91s stick. That line would not have had the energy to back check if one of those blocked shots went in STA favor. Thats what wins OT games i guess, we will get the next one.

Do you really know anything about hockey????
If STA blocks the shot they go nowhere. As tired as you may think the CRC line was they would have been twice as tired defending. Watch it again, your big guy #27 has a chance to get it out and he gets stripped by a kid that's 20lbs lighter and a few inches shorter. That line had energy to keep winning the battles. Cmon gramps. You've been around and know better to make stupid statements like that. And yes you will probably get the next one cause that's how hockey works. Teams are evenly matched and they will go back and forth.
27 wasn’t on the ice for the goal in ot. Pay attention or don’t comment.

Cr 91 can play.
so can CRC7, 9, 8, 11 and 17
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post