Not sure about this. Team improved last season quite a bit but don’t see much more than that. Could be wrong.
2010 GTHL AA East
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
MI relied on a 40 goal scorer last year. Is he back? If not those are hard skates to fill. Likely not improved this year if so.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 12:23 amNot sure about this. Team improved last season quite a bit but don’t see much more than that. Could be wrong.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
MI cut "40 goal scorer" referred to here. Knew some parents on MI who had mentioned he was a big problem in the room.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 10:03 amMI relied on a 40 goal scorer last year. Is he back? If not those are hard skates to fill. Likely not improved this year if so.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 12:23 amNot sure about this. Team improved last season quite a bit but don’t see much more than that. Could be wrong.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
Heard MI's 40-goal scorer went to play in 2009 division, doubt that MI was able to replace him, but perhaps they benefitted from OMHA players wanting to come to the GTHL.
Heard that GP and WH got some late AAA cuts, so perhaps they will both be improved.
Wondering how FH, LF and NYK replaced all the strong players that left (if at all).
Heard EE and SYB had some changes, so it will be interesting to see the impact of that. They usually find top level replacement players, but who knows - this year has been a strange one.
NT seems to be the one team that didn't change much at all so I guess they can be considered the favorites.
NT
EE
WH
SYB
GP
FH
NYK
MI
LF
TR
Heard that GP and WH got some late AAA cuts, so perhaps they will both be improved.
Wondering how FH, LF and NYK replaced all the strong players that left (if at all).
Heard EE and SYB had some changes, so it will be interesting to see the impact of that. They usually find top level replacement players, but who knows - this year has been a strange one.
NT seems to be the one team that didn't change much at all so I guess they can be considered the favorites.
NT
EE
WH
SYB
GP
FH
NYK
MI
LF
TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
No, MI's top scorer wasn't a problem in the room (really wonder who's writing this !?!) and he wasn't cut - he was always leaving, it was a one year deal and coaches knew it, they were just bitter about it I heard. People writing garbage rumours anonymously on a website to try and stick it to some random kid is so absolutely low and trash, it's hard to believe there are people that feel so small inside they have to do that.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 10:40 amMI cut "40 goal scorer" referred to here. Knew some parents on MI who had mentioned he was a big problem in the room.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 10:03 amMI relied on a 40 goal scorer last year. Is he back? If not those are hard skates to fill. Likely not improved this year if so.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 12:23 amNot sure about this. Team improved last season quite a bit but don’t see much more than that. Could be wrong.
Shame on the garbage person who made that comment - you should be ashamed of yourself.
GP didn't get anyone new or great, and they had players decommit
Likely something more like this next year:
EE
SYB
NT
WH
NYK
FH
LF
MI
GP
TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
Interesting comments on GP, one post says they got some late AAA cuts and the other post says they didn't get anyone new of consequence and had players decommit. I wonder what's true? So many late moving parts I guess it's hard to know what's really happening.
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
This is what I'm hearing I hope it's true because it's better for the East
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
He very much was. Easily shut down by the bruuuuuiiiinnnsss because he doesn’t pass.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 11:32 amNo, MI's top scorer wasn't a problem in the room (really wonder who's writing this !?!) and he wasn't cut - he was always leaving, it was a one year deal and coaches knew it, they were just bitter about it I heard. People writing garbage rumours anonymously on a website to try and stick it to some random kid is so absolutely low and trash, it's hard to believe there are people that feel so small inside they have to do that.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 10:40 amMI cut "40 goal scorer" referred to here. Knew some parents on MI who had mentioned he was a big problem in the room.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 10:03 amMI relied on a 40 goal scorer last year. Is he back? If not those are hard skates to fill. Likely not improved this year if so.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 12:23 amNot sure about this. Team improved last season quite a bit but don’t see much more than that. Could be wrong.
Shame on the garbage person who made that comment - you should be ashamed of yourself.
GP didn't get anyone new or great, and they had players decommit
Likely something more like this next year:
EE
SYB
NT
WH
NYK
FH
LF
MI
GP
TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
EE, SYB, WH all had AAA players at tryouts. WH added 2 from LF, 2 from NYK including a goalie. Those additions were already rumoured before tryouts.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 11:02 am Heard MI's 40-goal scorer went to play in 2009 division, doubt that MI was able to replace him, but perhaps they benefitted from OMHA players wanting to come to the GTHL.
Heard that GP and WH got some late AAA cuts, so perhaps they will both be improved.
Wondering how FH, LF and NYK replaced all the strong players that left (if at all).
Heard EE and SYB had some changes, so it will be interesting to see the impact of that. They usually find top level replacement players, but who knows - this year has been a strange one.
NT seems to be the one team that didn't change much at all so I guess they can be considered the favorites.
NT
EE
WH
SYB
GP
FH
NYK
MI
LF
TR
-
Guest
Re: 2010 GTHL AA East
MI goalie went on a heater for the last half of the year. He took them to the playoffs, not the bad apple goal scorer.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 10:03 amMI relied on a 40 goal scorer last year. Is he back? If not those are hard skates to fill. Likely not improved this year if so.Guest wrote: ↑Fri May 02, 2025 12:23 amNot sure about this. Team improved last season quite a bit but don’t see much more than that. Could be wrong.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post